The Pentax K-x arrived today. I don’t want to ramble on about all the features and such yet because I have not played with it enough to pass judgement on it yet. I just want to post this three up image of shots I snapped just before a partly cloudy sunset ended here today. It shows (top to bottom) HDR Capture Mode “Strong”, then HDR Capture Mode “Standard”, then no HDR Mode and just one simple frame.
The image is of one of the public beach access points here. It has not only rained at this location recently, but one of the natural dune lakes that sits against the beach (100 yards north of the gulf) broke through one of its natural walls (sand) some dark brackish waters spilled onto the beach. Hence the wet and dirty strip of sand you’ll see. It is a naturally occurring thing here where some of these lakes sit. Only Australia has similar dune lakes naturally occurring like we have here along the Emerald Coast of North West Florida. The lakes are large and beautiful and allow you to canoe vast areas just hundreds of yards from the gulf of mexico. They run right up against many beach points.
When it rains here, certain dune lakes will sometimes overflow and spill into the gulf itself and salt water and lake waters will flow back and forth and then seal back up again when weather calms down. Sometimes a lake wall just oozes a little lake water onto the beach area as it did this time. It happens a few times a year and within a few weeks the powdery white sand covers the darker sand back up again as if it never happened. This generally occurs in the fall/spring outside of tourist season. However, we have had unusually horrible weather here the last two weeks with virtually no sun and many rainy days. The dune lakes have filled up and this particular one spilled over onto this beach.
I say all this because I don’t want you to think those dark areas are an artifact from the HDR mode versions captured (below). The HDR mode and tonemapping did NOT have to do with this strip of dark sand. It was the lake overflow.
The images below were simply resized down. All three are JPEGs right out of camera. The HDR mode fires off a 3 frame AEB and the final image is a tonemapped JPEG. I purposely chose a shot that is not something any camera sensor can handle in one shot. The image on the bottom is one simple frame with no HDR mode. As you can see, the sun despite being shielded slightly by clouds, still blows out badly and much of the water reflection is also blown out. The middle image is using the camera’s HDR Mode set to “Standard” and the top image is using the camera’s HDR mode set to “Strong”. No photoshop or post tweaks. The saturation differences are a result of the merging (tonemapping) process and I can’t control that. Although I did have the camera setting set to “standard” for color. I’ll experiement with “Vibrant” and the like in the future to see variations.
I was in a rush and by mistake I had the camera set to auto white balance (ugh!!!). So color differences are probably even less scientific between shots given that idiotic oversight. BTW, this was not a planned shoot… I just rushed down when the cloud cover broke and snapped a few shots. I shot in Aperture priority mode for each. The clouds moved of course… the HDR Capture Mode takes 3 shots bracketed and then it takes about 10+ seconds for the camera to merge the shots before you can retake another shot, so there is no way to show you a true comparison with the sky moving as briskly as it was. The 3 shot burst itself is quick. The camera sports a 4.7 fps speed, but the merging process takes time.
So what you see below is not bracketed shots taken into post, merged and then tweaked. These are right out of camera JPEGs, but there is obviously some tone mapping operator doing some work in camera. The “Strong” is definitely too intense for my commercial work and “Standard” while less intense is borderline workable for what I do… but I’ll wait until I’ve put it through a bunch of tests and interior architectural shoots.

K-x quick test of HDR Capture Mode
Weather is supposed to stay crappy here for almost another week so it may be some time before I get around to getting this camera pushed through a true test run and then posting results. But I will ASAP.
For instant gratification, the K-x rocks. No long merge to HDR time in post. Just shoot and in 10-12 seconds you can see the JPEG and change your settings to reshoot. Oh, and that reminds me to mention that you can of course use the exposure compensation….
… the Pentax K-x allows for +/- 3.0EV so you can easily control where the base exposure will begin. And of course I’ll be experimenting with taking multiple HDR captures taken at various +/-EV settings and then use those JPEGs to merge in post to see if anything interesting comes from it or if it is not beneficial. We’ll see. Merging tonemapped jpegs? Can you say “artifacts”? Probably. But I just have to do it for the hell of it.
Oh #2… the AEB function allows for a traditional 3 AEB burst at +/-3.0EV. You can bracket as little as .3 and it goes up by steps of .3 right up to a full +/-3.0 EV like a Canon 7D or Sigma SD14 does (both of them shoot a 3 AEB which can max out at +/-3.0EV).
More to come when weather breaks for the better.
Thanks for the review. I’ve wanted to jump into the DSLR realm for a while but didn’t want to break the bank to get something decent. Finally I think K-x my be the perfect fit and the HDR mode is a huge plus.
Your real estate shots make me laugh. A few months back, after three years, I left a graphic design position at a high end real estate company in southern California so I looked at shots like these all day/everyday.
Thanks very much for this review. I was thinkinbg about buying he K-x or K-r but initially put off by all the specs saying that aeb is 3 frames maximum +/- 1.5 EV (spread of 3EV) which is not enough for most HDR.
) on their websites under specification and what is actually on the camera. Have you actually used +/- 3.0EV on the camera? If so this is excellent news!
So I downloaded both manuals from the Pentax site and it clearly shows in the manual a scale which shows settings up to +/- 3.0EV! That’s a spread of 6EV.
I notice from your review you also confirm “a traditonal 3 AEB burst at +/- 3.0EV”. There sems to be a disconnect between what is being published by Pentax and every review (except yours
Thanks for your help – John Wagner
John, yes… 3aeb +/-3.0 is possible. I’ve used it, but just as a test. I shoot interiors so you can’t shoot 3aeb for interiors with such large steps and only 3aeb. Unless of course quality is not important and one is just looking for better than one shot.
The HDR in camera is disappointing to me. Quality wise.
I can’t wait til one of these companies finally just captures the bracket to .EXR so we can all just do the tonemapping in post. Their in camera closed/black box proprietary way is not very good.
Thanks for that reassurance. I think I will get the K-r next week with the 12-24 lens for landscape photography. It seems like an awesome camera.
Ine further point that may be of interest. I use Dynamic Photo HDR for post processing to HDR. The reason is I do 90% hand-held and this software has an amazing alignment feature where you can align different parts of the picture independently. Also their ghosting facility works extremely well.